Cases 1 - 10 of 8,777
Griffin v. USA
as 3:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Leroy Raymond Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claudio v. DeLoach et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Raymond Claudio
Defendant:
H.D. Gator DeLoach, Breckenricke, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron Davila v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Bergeron Davila
Defendant:
Lt Marcus King, CO Palacios, CO Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgison v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Raymond Burgison
Defendant:
Deron Smith, Blevons, Quaid Cohleymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00515
Petitioner:
Raymond Earl Robinson, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Shamber, III v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
Raymond Martin Shamber, III
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dowell v. DOJ MRU FOIA et al
as 6:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond Dowell
Defendant:
DOJ MRU FOIA, Madill Sheriff Department and Secret Service Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11814
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
