Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ralph Jessup v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-16972
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH THOMAS JESSUP
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Martinez v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2016cv00405
Petitioner:
Ralph Thomas Martinez, Jr
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jessup v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02097
Petitioner:
Ralph Thomas Jessup
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00187
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HARRELL WATTS
Plaintiff:
RALPH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith et al v. Gueaseka et al
as 3:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
William B. Keith, Bobby Cox and Tevarus Young
Defendant:
Sandya Gueaseka, Elliott Garrett, Debra K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian Smith v. City of Aiken Public Work
as 10-7201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN MARION SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AIKEN PUBLIC WORKS, TIM COALEY, RALPH THOMAS and others
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv02327
Plaintiff:
RALPH THOMAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARRELL WATTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Aiken Public Works, City of et al
as 3:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Adrian Marion Smith
Defendant:
Aiken Public Works, City of, Tim Coaley, Ralph Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Thomas et al
as 9:2008cv80638
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Jones
Defendant:
Ralph Thomas, Willie Floyd and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
