Cases 1 - 10 of 32
AUGHENBAUGH v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
RAYN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH and RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT A.J. SMITH and LINDSAY GAINEY TA'KAIYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Thoms et al
as 2:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Larry V Henderson, Jr
Defendant:
Zarch Thoms, Racheal Goldbeck, Rayn Captenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HREJN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
HARLEY HREJN, DREW RAYNE and DAVID ANDREW TENNANT
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kueppes
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Gerry Wilson
Defendant:
Rayn Kueppes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DELLA RAYN LOCKLEAR v. USA
as 1:2022cv00415
Petitioner:
DELLA RAYN LOCKLEAR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rayne v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv14013
Plaintiff:
Drew Rayne and David A. Tennant
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raynes v. Smith et al
as 6:2020cv01052
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthew Raynes
Defendant:
Chris Whitley and Adam Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. INDA et al
as 2:2019cv00398
Defendant:
KELLY INDA, MARY SIMS, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTION FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v. JONES
as 5:2018cv00206
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, LOLLIE NEAL, MEADOWS and others
Plaintiff:
DENNY LEE NEWMAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Correct Health et al
as 3:2017cv00609
Defendant:
Andrea Brown, Sheryl Brown, Unknown Chaptman and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
