Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Wilson v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Roddy Sweet, Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zavala v. Bolin et al
as 1:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Roddy Lee Zavala
Defendant:
J Bolin, FNU Anding and M Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
Chad Arnold
Respondent:
County of San Diego Corporation, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sheets v. Struthers City Police Department et al.
as 4:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
James Sheets and Atty. Tracie Schmidt
Defendant:
Struthers City Police Department, City of Struthers, Thomas Schneeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roddy v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Antonio Marquis Roddy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Qian Williams
Defendant:
Dale Taylor, Kenneth Baker, Karl Kadon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODDY v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2022cv00309
Petitioner:
ALICIA LYNN RODDY
Respondent:
WARDEN and KEVIN PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Roddy
as 22-10934
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alicia Lynn Roddy
Roddis v. Kolitwenzew
as 3:2022cv03159
Petitioner:
Ryan M. Roddis
Respondent:
Chad Kolitwenzew
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roddy v. USA
as 4:2021cv01244
Petitioner:
Alicia Lynn Roddy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
