Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Phoenix v. Dotson, et al
as 3:2024cv00625
Defendant:
David Robinson, Dana Watson, Darrell Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. TextBehind, LLC et al
as 5:2024ct03187
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, TextBehind, LLC, NCDPS and others
Plaintiff:
Siddhanth Sharma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02619
Respondent:
Billy Eischen
Petitioner:
Aditya Raj Sharma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharma v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Sohrab Sharma
Defendant:
Colette Peters and W D Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Siddhanth Sharma v. Demetrius Clark
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, FELIX TAYLOR, DEAN HEFFERNAN and others
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulvey v. Nassau University Medical Center et al
as 2:2023cv08855
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Mulvey
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center, Dr. Aanchal Sharma and Dr. Leena Mohan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
