Cases 1 - 10 of 368
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Swift v. Does, et al
as 24-2048
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Swift
Defendant:
Does, Natallia Carpenter, Correctional Officer, ADC and Shanda Glover, Nurse
Titus v. Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and IamsuiTitus
Defendant:
Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution, Givendy Distribution, Back to the Future (the Movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Doe and Clint Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
