Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Jason Toro v. Robert Luna
as 2:2023cv08872
Plaintiff:
Jason Toro
Defendant:
Robert Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
TORO-NEGRON v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv06963
Petitioner:
CALEB JOSUE TORO-NEGRON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Gonzalez v. Ressendis et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Macario Torres Gonzalez
Defendant:
R. Ressendis, Isabel del Toro and B. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Sainvil et al
as 6:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Sainvil, Kinsey, Toro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toro v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00693
Petitioner:
Florian Toro
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lamar Forbes v. Carlos Del Toro, et al
as 23-5012
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lamar A. Forbes
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas W. Harker, Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the Navy and Randall Lamoureux, President, Naval Clemency and Parole Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simpson v. Berger et al
as 4:2022cv00522
Petitioner:
Gregory S. Simpson
Respondent:
Commandant of the Ma General David H. Berger, Secretary of the Nav The Honorable Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of Defense The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Del Toro v. Daram et al
as 2:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Steven Del Toro
Defendant:
Vasuki Daram and Antwong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
