Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUNSTALL-CAREY v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv04307
Plaintiff:
OMAR TUNSTALL-CAREY
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY, MICHAEL KELLY and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Tunstall v. Allen Davis
as 22-7235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN ALLEN DAVIS, SERGEANT LOCKLEAR, MR. TUBBS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. Davis et al
as 5:2022ct03214
Plaintiff:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall
Defendant:
Captain Allen Davis, Sergeant Locklear, Mr. Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Kameron Tunstall
Respondent:
Tom Schweitzer and Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Tunstall v. Mary Locklear
as 22-6295
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN MARY LOCKLEAR
Tunstall v. Locklear
as 5:2021hc02240
Petitioner:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belk et al v. Mayor et al
as 3:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Cameron Belk, Sr., Derek Burton, Michael M. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Mayor, Police Chief, Detectives and others
Interested Party:
Dion Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
