Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Loureiro, Jr. v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv01599
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. F. Joshua Loureiro, Jr.
Defendant:
K. Santoro, K. Drake, J. Jaime and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Waters et al
as 4:2015cv03010
Plaintiff:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr
Defendant:
W. F. Waters and Houston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
RONALD BANKS
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, BARRY GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemph v. Brown et al
as 7:2012cv00430
Defendant:
W. F. Brown and Town of Vinton
Plaintiff:
William T. Kemph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Odom v. FNU LNU
as 11-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU LNU, Sgt W-F in Booking on 4-22-2011 at Approx 6:30 p.m., FNU MACK, FNU SOG OFFICER, short in height and others
Boatman v. Shemer et al
as 3:2011cv00505
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
M. Shemer, R. Bryant, L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Elio Madan, P Gudino, Victor Selyutin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George et al v. Calliott et al
as 3:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
Stefon M. George and Betty George
Defendant:
W. F. Calliott, Bain-Sheldon, P.L.C., Gregory R. Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
James Doenges v. Saundra Winstead
as 08-6588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES GEORGE DOENGES
Defendant - Appellee:
SAUNDRA WINSTEAD, Dr., Physician, W. F. AMONETTE, Dr., Physician, LISA EDWARDS, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
