Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Warfield v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff:
Kelly Warfield
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections and State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Early v. Callejas et al
as 2:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Olajuwan Early
Defendant:
Abigail Callejas, Jerome Warfield, Ricardo Moore and others
(PC) Warfield v. Tibbet et al
as 2:2023cv01546
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
Walt Tibbet, Donald A. duBain, Krishna A. Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv11666
Plaintiff:
Javan Jerrelle Wilson, Sr.
Defendant:
Nathanael Smith, John Doe, Brian Shipman and others
Cage v. Beard et al
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant:
Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Landis Cage
Clark v. Bacon et al
as 2:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Kim C Clark and Deonna Hughes
Defendant:
King County Correctional Facility, Bacon, V Cordero-Nieves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warfield v. Adams et al
as 4:2023cv04028
Plaintiff:
Phillip Warfield, Jr
Defendant:
Golden Captain Adams, Sergeant Golden, Sergeant Hanning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Daley et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
James Kline Myers
Defendant:
Jailer James Daley, Deven Rodriquez, Deputy Karl T. Markowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warfield v. District Attorney et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
John Henry Warfield and John H Warfield
Defendant:
District Attorney, I.D.O.C. and Supreme Justice Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warfield v. Richards et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
John Henry Warfield and John H Warfield
Defendant:
Karen Richards and State Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
