Cases 1 - 10 of 80,881
Hohmann v. St. Andre
as 1:2024cv03597
Petitioner:
Robert C. Hohmann
Respondent:
Warden Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tressa Rainey v. Warden Ricolcol et al
as 5:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Tressa Rainey
Defendant:
Warden Ricolcol, Captain Dennis, Unit Team Manager Aragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
PERALTA-ROSARIO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv07038
Petitioner:
DAVID PERALTA-ROSARIO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bridgewater v. Frederick
as 2:2024cv03224
Petitioner:
Dominique Bridgewater
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joshua Stockton v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2209
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC (originally named as Solomon Graves), Aundrea Culclager, Deputy Director, Central Office, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, Central Office, ADC and others
Sears v. Long, et al
as 24-1256
Petitioner:
CRISTINA W. SEARS
Respondent:
RYAN LONG, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Jimenez-Heyer v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Roberto Jimenez-Heyer
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bryson v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bryson
Defendant:
Warden Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
