Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,958
Titus v. Davis
as 2:2024cv02641
Petitioner: Timothy Titus
Respondent: Cynthia Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florez-Ramirez
as 2:2024cv02335
Plaintiff: Florez-Ramirez
Defendant: Jacques Jones, Tracy Williams, Carlus Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff: Jerone Alexander
Defendant: Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: Keith Nichols
Defendant: P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant: Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner: Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent: William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Herbert et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff: Sarah Pitts
Defendant: Angel Herbert, Burton Dunn, Vanessa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Louis Davis
Defendant: Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant: SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner: Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent: Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?