Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Adams v. California Prison Industry Authority et al
as 2:2020cv01901
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
Kevin Molle, T. Tozi, California Prison Industry Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Adams v. Covello et al
as 2:2020cv01902
Defendant:
J. Mora, B. Holmes, Quiring and others
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Bodiford et al
as 5:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Shad William Adams
Defendant:
Mr Bodiford, Mr Scheinsthul and Sgt Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spell v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv02052
Petitioner:
William Adam Spell
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shomo v. State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00916
Defendant:
Cluadia Mott, Karl Fougerson, Jane Hyland and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Shomo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hardy v. William Adams, et al
as 16-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS, (ARUS) Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, LINDA ADAMS, (ARUS) Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, ROBERT AULT, (R.U.M.) Resident Unit Manager and others
Defendant:
GREG MCQUIGGIN, Warden, Chippewa Correctional Facility
Adams v. Judge Reno et al
as 4:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
Judge Reno and Steve Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Loper et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Stanley Montgomery (DO NOT FILE)
Defendant:
Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Marshall Fisher, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Ulit, et al.
as 1:2015cv00642
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
Wayne Ulit, Jong Moon and Edgar Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Adams v. William Adams, et al
as 14-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD S. ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS, PETE FAJMAN, Officer #142 and AMARI DAWSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
