Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,259
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC. BM-F-9 RIFLE CAL:9 SN: 21973F et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC. BM-F-9 RIFLE CAL:9 SN: 21973F, BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC. BM-F-9 PISTOL CAL:9 SN:19204F, BRIGADE MANUFACTURING, INC. BM-F-9 PISTOL CAL:MULTI SN:24537F and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately 189 Firearms Seized From Gator Guns, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately 189 Firearms Seized From Gator Guns, Inc.
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA vs. Nine, more or less, 50-pound permeable triple layer brown paper bags, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01954
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Nine, more or less, 50-pound permeable triple layer brown paper bags, of an article of food, Thirty-eight, more or less, 55-pound permeable white plastic woven bags, of an article of food, Forty-four, more or less, 55-pound permeable white plastic woven bags, of an article of food and others
Claimant: Gold Coast Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Glock Inc. 30S Pistol CAL:45 SN: BFTL715 et al
as 4:2023cv12279
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Glock Inc. 30S Pistol CAL:45 SN: BFTL715, 13 Rounds Barnes Bullets Ammunition CAL: 45, GARAYSAR, INC. Unknown Shotgun CAL: Unknown SN:21T-008616 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Heartland Outdoor, Inc. v. Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv01182
Petitioner: Heartland Outdoor, Inc. doing business as Heartland Outdoor
Respondent: William J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States of America v. Real Property et al
as 4:2023cv00609
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property, 515 Rounds Assorted Ammunition CAL:Multi, 20 Rounds FN (FNH) Ammunition CAL:57 and others
Interested Party: Norberto Torres
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $3700 US Currency et al
as 3:2023cv03032
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Three Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($3,700.00) in United States Currency, Polymer80, Inc (P80 Tactical) PFC9 pistol, Mauser M-15 Rifle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Firearms Seizure, Forfeiture and Disposition of Firearm
USA v. 84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, et al.
as 6:2023cv01226
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 84902 Hideaway Hills Road, City of Eugene, Lane County, State and District of Oregon, $129,822.00 (U.S.), $4,000.00 (U.S.) and others
Claimant: Kit and Karen Chan Family LLC, Karen Chan and Kit Chan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Sig-Sauer P320 Pistol Cal:9SN: 58J108146 et al
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: SIG-SAUER P320 PISTOL CAL:9SN: 58J108146, SIG-SAUER SP2022 PISTOL CAL:9 SN: 24B258521, SIG-SAUER P365 XL PISTOL CAL:9 SN: 66A187714 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?