Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States of America v. Two (2) Westinghouse 600 Amp 3 Pole Breakers et al
as 5:2021cv00297
Defendant: Eaton 1200 Amp NGS-50K 2 Pole Breakers, Eaton 300 Amp 3 Pole Breaker, Westinghouse Series C 40 Amp 3 Pole Breaker and others
Interested Party: Jerry Harvey
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Four (4) Cutler Hammer 30 Amp 2 Pole Breakers et al
as 5:2021cv00296
Defendant: Ten (10) Eaton 400 Amp 3 Pole Breakers, Eaton 300 Amp 3 Pole Breaker, Westinghouse Series C 40 Amp 3 Pole Breaker and others
Interested Party: David Blanchard
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $1,751.00 in United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00232
Defendant: 2003 Chevrolete Silverado (VIN: 1GCHK29183E152488), $1,751.00 in United States Currency and Chevrolete Silverado 2003
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Donna Lee Watts
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
USA v. Sum of $70,990,605, et al
as 14-5031
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: Sum of $70,990,605, Held in account number 050210000527810 in the name of Hikmat Shadman Logistics Services Company, Located at Afghanistan International Bank, Shahr-E-Naw, Haji Yaqoob Square, Shahabudin Watt, P.O. Box 2074, Kabul, Afghanistan, and all in, Sum of $6,930,000, Held in account number 050210001288613, in the name of Faizy Elham Brothers, Ltd., Located at Afghanistan International Bank, Shahr-E-Naw, Haji Yaqoob Square, Shahabudin Watt, P.O. Box 2074, Kabul, Afghanistan, and all interest, benefi and All Defendants, IN REM
Claimant - Appellant: Hikmatullah Shadman, Najibullah, Faizy Elham Brothers, Ltd. and others
United States of America v. $41,067.58 (US) et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Defendant: $41,067.58 (US), 2001 Mercedes Benz S500, 2008 Harley Davidson FLHX and others
Claimant: Kenton Anthony Parsons
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $82,568.61 In U S Currency et al
as 2:2012cv10636
Defendant: 1 Powerbox DPC-15000 Lighting Controller, 17 Ballasts and 2 Magnum XXXL 8 Hood Lights with 2 1000 Watt Bulbs and 82,568.61 In U S Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP, Sixteen (16) 650CC motorcycles Model WF650-T, Fifty (50) 163CC 5.5 HP gas powered 2800 watt electric generators, Model WF2800D and others
Claimant: Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. and Wildfire Motors
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP et al
as 2:2011cv00130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP, Sixteen (16) 650CC motorcycles Model WF650-T, Fifty (50) 163CC 5.5 HP gas powered 2800 watt electric generators, Model WF2800D and others
Claimant: Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. and Wildfire Motors
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $272,117.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 0:2011cv00102
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $272,117.00 in U.S. Currency, 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 and 2005 Wells Cargo Trailer
Claimant: Brian Michael Watts
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
United States of America v. Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP et al
as 2:2011cv88888
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Thirty-six (36) 300CC on road Scooters, Model WF300-SP, Sixteen (16) 650CC motorcycles Model WF650-T, Fifty (50) 163CC 5.5 HP gas powered 2800 watt electric generators, Model WF2800D and others
Claimant: Snyder Computer Systems, Inc. and Wildfire Motors
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?