Cases 21 - 30 of 152
SESSOMS et al v. PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv17060
Defendant:
PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MAHESH PATEL, BHAVESH PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
TITANIA LYLES, LASHIDA SESSOMS, TRINA PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brzozowski v. Pratt Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00523
Defendant:
Pratt Paper (OH), LLC and Pratt Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brzozowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chavez v. Pratt (Robert Mann Packaging), LLC
as 5:2019cv00719
Defendant:
Pratt (Robert Mann Packaging), LLC
Plaintiff:
Juan Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Pratt & Whitney
as 3:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney
Plaintiff:
Dushan Morgan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Kennedy v. Pratt & Whitney
as 3:2018cv01474
Plaintiff:
Robert Kennedy
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Xochimitl Oropeza et al v. John Doe Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv05747
Plaintiff:
Martin Xochimitl Oropeza
Defendant:
John Doe Corp., Derek Pratt, Carmen Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pratt v. Mackay Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ben L Pratt
Defendant:
Mackay Communications, Inc. and Jeffrey Schlacks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Fareed v. Pure Natural Nail Lounge, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv02196
Plaintiff:
La Shanna Fareed
Defendant:
Pure Natural Nail Lounge, LLC, Coy V. Bentley, Tuyen T. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Kleckley v. Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN KLECKLEY
Defendant:
PRATT & WHITNEY ENGINE SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Burch v. Roofers Local No. 20 Health and Welfare Fund et al
as 4:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E Burch
Defendant:
Roofers Local No. 20 Health and Welfare Fund , Kevin King , Charles T Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
