Cases 71 - 80 of 290
McPhee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 0:2017cv62308
Plaintiff:
Theo McPhee
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Kang v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 5:2017cv06220
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
James C Kang and Michael Moses
Not Classified By Court:
Kirk E Fyson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GRAND MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07885
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
GRAND MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, LLC, 141 COIT ST, LLC, G50 PRODUCTIONS, INC. and others
Garnishee:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. and NEWBANK
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
DAY v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv06237
Plaintiff:
DARLENE DAY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY , WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PIPER v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv06222
Plaintiff:
GAYLE PIPER
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY , WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeBoy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 5:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Rachael DeBoy
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Kerness v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 2:2017cv02516
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Kerness
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Sweeting v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 3:2017cv00309
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff:
Monique Sweeting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARBOSE et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2017cv02287
Plaintiff:
DREA BARBOSE and JOSHUA MORENO
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
