Cases 81 - 90 of 2,416
Michaelson v. Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Collin Michaelson
Defendant:
Clean Cut Lawn Care, LLC and Andrew Case
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bemiss v. Alcazar et al
as 2:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
John Bemiss
Defendant:
Andrew Alcazar, Russo and Steele LLC and Russo and Steele Phantom Equity Incentive Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Heath v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv03841
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Heath
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Zoldan v. Marblegate Asset Management, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Mark Zoldan
Defendant:
Marblegate Asset Management, LLC, Marblegate IM Holdings, LLC, Marblegate Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tan and Raef Lawson
Defendant:
Grubhub, Inc. and Grubhub Holdings Inc
Interested Party:
Caviar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Renfroe v. Amanda-Andrews Personnel Corporation, et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RENFROE
Defendant:
AMANDA-ANDREWS PERSONNEL CORPORATION D/B/A VIP STAFFING, SIMWON NA, CORP. and Amanda-Andrews Personnel Corporation doing business as VIP Staffing
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Arnold et al v. X Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00528
Defendant:
X Corp., X Holdings Corp., Twitter Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wolfram Arnold, Erik Froese, Tracy Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Darden v. Colbea Enterprises, L.L.C.
as 1:2023cv11540
Plaintiff:
Joshalyn Darden
Defendant:
Colbea Enterprises, L.L.C. and Andrew Delli Carpini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
