Cases 1 - 10 of 1,054
Kingry v. Consumers Power Company
as 1:2024cv11549
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kingry
Defendant:
Consumers Power Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sharon L. Sperry v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv04149
Plaintiff:
Sharon L. Sperry
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMEARICA and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
MUHAMMAD v. HOME HEALTH ADVANTAGE INC.
as 2:2024cv01998
Plaintiff:
SHARON MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
HOME HEALTH ADVANTAGE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv03473
Plaintiff:
Francesca Anderson, Sabretha Ervin Turner, Sabrina Morell and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
King et al v. City National Bank of Florida
as 1:2024cv21733
Plaintiff:
Bradley King, David Hager and Sharon Peacock
Defendant:
City National Bank of Florida
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McRee v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Sharon McRee
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Henderson v. Shiv Hospitality Group Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sharon Henderson
Defendant:
Shiv Hospitality Group Inc and Praful Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Arredondo Esquivel v. East Coast Tree Care, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Cledin Emilson Arredondo Esquivel
Defendant:
East Coast Tree Care, Inc., Sharon Catherine Schmitt and Michele Marie Sheckells
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sharon Mcdonald v. Coliseum Medical Center, LLC
as 24-10176
Plaintiff:
SHARON MCDONALD
Defendant:
COLISEUM MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
