Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Arbois v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2017cv22725
Plaintiff:
Aleida Arbois
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Raul Carranza v. McDonald's Corporation
as 2:2016cv09572
Plaintiff:
Raul Carranza
Defendant:
DOES and McDonald's Corporation
Overbay v. McDonald's Corporation et al (TV3)
as 2:2016cv00337
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, John Ray Israel, Israel Enterprises and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Elaine Overbay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCGINLEY v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv06056
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE G. MCGINLEY
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS and TADS ENTERPRISES LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Drumgold et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv13504
Plaintiff:
Christopher Drumgold , Gwendolyn Hicks , DeAngelo Hughes and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's USA, LLC and ECS Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grant et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv13505
Plaintiff:
LaToya Grant , Kai Harris , LaKasha Mosley and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, McDonald's USA, LLC, Ronald Moten and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hiett v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Timothy A. Hiett
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation , McDonald's Restaurants of West Virginia, Inc. and George Arthur
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dudley et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv10236
Plaintiff:
April Dudley and Latora Wright
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation , McDonalds USA, LLC , Lott Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aguirre v. PRENTICE HALL CORP. SYSTEM
as 3:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Rachel Aguirre
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lee v. McDonald's Corporation
as 2:2014cv02473
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tao O Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
