Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Mendez v. Brown Davis Interiors, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21396
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Mendez
Defendant:
Brown Davis Interiors, Inc., Todd D Davis and Robert S Brown
Brown v. Golden Bridges Food Pantry, Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv04628
Plaintiff:
Tokia S. Brown
Defendant:
Golden Bridges Private Home Care, LLC and Golden Bridges Food Pantry, Incorporated
Brown v. Robert Trent Jones Golf Club, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00829
Plaintiff:
Actwood S Brown
Defendant:
Robert Trent Jones Golf Club, Inc., Scott Furlong and ADP TotalSource Co. XXIII, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Brown-Freddie v. The Workforce Group, LLC
as 4:2019cv04154
Defendant:
The Workforce Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Loretta S Brown-Freddie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Euflora, JS Investments et al
as 1:2016cv02479
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Brown
Defendant:
Euflora, JS Investments and Jamie Perino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. JNH Investments, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Brown
Defendant:
JNH Investments, Inc., J and H Investments Group, LLC, John Alseinh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Freddie Brown v. Sysco Food Services Of Metro N, et al
as 14-4536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE S. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF METRO NEW YORK LLC, SYCRO CORPORATION RETIREMENT FUND and SHELLY BUDHAR
BROWN v. SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF METRO NEW YORK LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00474
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE S. BROWN
Defendant:
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF METRO NEW YORK LLC , SYSCO CORPORATION RETIREMENT FUND , SHELLY BUDHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Belz v. Brown
as 1:2013cv13133
Plaintiff:
Gretchen M Belz
Defendant:
Richard S Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. McClure
as 1:2012cv03704
Plaintiff:
Angela S. Brown
Defendant:
David McClure and Amalgameted Transit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
