Cases 41 - 50 of 6,300
DEBS, et al., v. USA
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ABRAMS, II, KENNETH A. HAMLER, GLENDA MALFE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Defendant:
Carolyn MacDonald, Lee Windsor, Paul Mazerolle and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Intervenor:
Prof Eugene Volokh
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Irwin et al v. ZOLL Laboratory Services, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00222
Defendant:
ZOLL Laboratory Services, LLC and ZOLL Medical Corp.
Plaintiff:
Andrea Irwin and John Tyler Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Defendant:
High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Clay Sears, June Salisbury and others
Counter-Defendant:
Pizz, Inc, Karla Sanchez, Kapacke Mining and others
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Counter-Claimant:
Nikolai L. Dobrescu, Camie Southam, High Lonesome Mining, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gangavaram v. Devi Kondapi
as 8:2024cv01203
Defendant:
Sai Jyothsna Devi Kondapi
Plaintiff:
Sumitra Gangavaram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOGICAL SOLUTION SERVICES INC.
as 3:2024cv06276
Defendant:
RICHARD MCMAHON
Plaintiff:
LOGICAL SOLUTION SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sifford v. Chaeffer et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Defendant:
Chaeffer and Sears
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt F. Sifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLernon v. Scott et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen McLernon
Defendant:
Blake Scott, eHealhInsurance Services, Inc. and Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
