Cases 91 - 100 of 562
Brooks #153447 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Preston Purnell #526991, Kentreze White #799568, Dreshawn Dawon Harris #415940 and others
Defendant:
Unknown Gierke, Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BEEBE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02870
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHARLES BEEBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beebe v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sarah Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BEEBE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv20370
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
BETTY J. BEEBE
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEEBE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16867
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BEEBE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States ex rel Dr. Abraham Scheer v. Beebe Healthcare et al
as 2:2020cv06117
Defendant:
Jefferson Health, Beebe Healthcare, Jefferson Health System, Inc. individually and d/b/a Jefferson Health and others
Plaintiff:
United States ex rel Dr. Abraham Scheer
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Matthew Jones, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 20-56174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTH COUNTY SHOOTING CENTER, INC., FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1-20, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and MARTIN HORAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
