Cases 91 - 100 of 13,448
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. GRAY et al
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
WARDEN MR. GRAY, CAPTAIN MR. BURGESS, UNIT MANAGER MR. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gauna
as 24-40278
Plaintiff:
Jemadari Chinua Williams
Defendant:
Joel Gauna, Region IV Director, TDCJ, Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Hall and others
Sierra v. Moreno, et al.
as 24-2672
Plaintiff:
JORGE R. SIERRA
Defendant:
SIS Officer MORENO, Captain J. CERONE, Warden JACQUEZ and others
SMITH v. MCDANIEL et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, FULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Correction Department, C.O. Ceesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DERRICK v. FINAN et al
as 1:2024cv05637
Plaintiff:
OSH-SHAKKUR A. DERRICK
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS F. FINAN, SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER A. SOUTHARD and SOMERS POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
