Cases 91 - 100 of 750
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Coyle Trucking, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Coyle Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Applied Underwriters, Inc., Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc., Continental Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00810
Plaintiff:
Abner, Carl Abner, Donna Adair and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Petitioner:
Lloyd Dixon, III
Aery v. Kasper et al
as 0:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Tom Kasper, Troy Coyle and Beltrami County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEPHZIBAH v. DEMPSEY et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
SHEKINAH EL, SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH and HIGHLY FAVORED SHEKINAH EL
Defendant:
ANGELA COTE DEMPSEY, KATHLEEN MCCLEARY BOGENSHUTZ, MARTIN E FALB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mercedes et al v. Manhattan Food & Bev LTD et al
as 1:2022cv02777
Defendant:
William Reichenbach, Manhattan Food & Bev LTD doing business as Reichenbach Hall, Willy Reichenbach and others
Plaintiff:
Lorena Mercedes, Ethel Dubouzet, Barbora Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mark Habelt, et al v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al
as 22-15660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK HABELT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant / Appellee:
IRHYTHM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., KEVIN M. KING, MICHAEL J. COYLE and others
Evan Ng v. Board of Regents of the U of M, et al
as 22-1505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evan Ng
Defendant / Appellee:
Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, in his official capacity as Director of Athletics for the University of Minnesota and Joan T.A. Gabel, in her offiicial capacity as President of the University of Minnesota
COYLE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COYLE and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Lancaster v. Pierce et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
Unknown Pierce, Unknown Foukler, Unknown Peloski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
