Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 8,285
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02078
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Arcuri et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2024cv01734
Defendant: 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Allstar Fire Equipment and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Arcuri, Adam Campbell, Darren Durel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. v. Shibuya
as 1:2024cv02726
Plaintiff: Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.
Defendant: Darren Shibuya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
McFadden v. Fallas
as 1:2024cv02561
Plaintiff: Rachel McFadden
Defendant: Darren J. Fallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moore v. Pearson et al
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Kelsey Moore
Defendant: Elicia Pearson and Darren Justin Lee Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Phillips et al v. Galisky
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner: Dustin Phillips and Aaron Hallof
Respondent: Darren Galisky
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
USA v. Gilbert Simpson
as 24-5272
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GILBERT DARREN SIMPSON
Jane Doe 3 v. Indyke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 3
Defendant: Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MOJKA KAZANCHY et al v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv04115
Plaintiff: ASHLEY MOJKA KAZANCHY and BRIAN KAZANCHY
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, GREG POFF, DARREN CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?