Cases 91 - 100 of 245
Simmons et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08353
Plaintiff:
Debra J. Simmons and Stephen Simmons
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv04981
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Simmons
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00312
Plaintiff:
JoAnn M. Simmons and Billy J. Simmons
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reddick v. Justice et al
as 2:2013cv03379
Plaintiff:
Belay Reddick
Defendant:
Pamela Justice, Mary M Mitchell, J Hollett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alli v. Muvley
as 13-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Captain Dunbar, Shield # 212
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Muvley, Dora Schriro, Hildy J. Simmons and others
Nosair v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
El-Sayyid Nosair
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leslie Smith, D Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Hinton et al
as 1:2013cv02566
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Simmons
Defendant:
Bryce Hinton, Scott Bird, Rodney Fenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amawi v. Walton et al
as 3:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Zaki Amawi
Defendant:
J. S. Walton, D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chairez-Esparza et al v. Darnell et al
as 7:2013cv00402
Plaintiff:
Noe Chairez-Esparza , Jaime Diaz, Jr. , Dora E Gongora and others
Defendant:
Jeffery J Darnell, Levi J Simmons, Jr. and Alma Gabriela Nava Simmons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
James E Nobles v. Carrollton TX Police Dept et al
as 2:2013cv05367
Defendant:
Carrollton TX, Carrollton TX Police Dept, Dr Manuel Griego, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
James E Nobles
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
