Cases 91 - 100 of 27,363
Mitchel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Cameron Mitchel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. O'Malley
as 24-30342
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mitchell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Khademi v. Superior Court of Placer County, et al.
as 24-3447
Plaintiff:
DAVOOD KHADEMI
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF PLACER COUNTY, PAUL WAYNE COMISKEY, Criminal Defense Attorney, KEVIN DOHERTY, Criminal Defense Attorney and others
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wade Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
William Allen v. Blackbaud, Inc.
as 24-180
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALLEN, KATHLEEN ARMAN, WILLIAM CARPANELLA and others
Respondent:
BLACKBAUD, INC., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MDL 2972
Plumbers and Fitters Local Union 101 et al v. Ehret Inc.
as 3:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Fitters Local Union 101, Plumbers and Fitters Local 101 Health and Welfare Fund, Scott Dietz and others
Defendant:
Ehret Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bergman v. Corfman et al
as 3:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Sean M Bergman
Defendant:
L. Corfman, Kristen Mitchell, C. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
