Cases 91 - 100 of 225
Moore #223268 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore #223268
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11957
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Trinity Services Group of Florida and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
USA v. Deshawn Hall
as 17-40163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DESHAWN PAUL HALL, also known as Deshawn Paul Davis
Roseway v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv00834
Defendant:
Paul Davis and Ryder Truck Rental Lt
Plaintiff:
Shakira Roseway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Davis et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00655
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis and Kimberly Davis
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbot Laboratories, Inc., AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Clarksean
as 1:2016cv01724
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis and Robert E. Johnson Family Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Thomas Clarksean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Clarksean
as 1:2016at00935
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis and Robert E. Johnson Family Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Thomas Clarksean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Timothy Baldwin v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 16-2509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY BURT, Warden, NORM CUNNINGHAM, State Employee, PAUL DAVIS, Deputy Warden and others
Dotis et al v. Stateless et al
as 5:2016cv06206
Plaintiff:
Demetrios Dotis and Vickie Dotis
Defendant:
Stateless, Chris James, Gerard Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
