Cases 91 - 100 of 588
Seay v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02571
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cheli Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seay v. ADLP Investments LLC
as 3:2021cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nyaar Seay
Defendant:
ADLP Investments LLC and ADLP Investments LLC Series 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 la
Seay, et al v. Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, et al
as 21-6054
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA CRAIG, R.D.H., Hygiene Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JAMES A. SPARKS, D.D.S., individually and President of District 5 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, JEFF LUNDAY, D.D.S., individually and 2nd Vice President of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH P. SEAY, D.D.S., MS and LOIS JACOBS, D.D.S., MS
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19510
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padgett v. Columbia, City of et al
as 3:2021cv01157
Defendant:
Sgt. Brown, Officer Leach, several John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John David Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15885
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SEAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAIL v. TENTH JUDICIAL SAO et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, ASHLEY MOODY, GERARD and others
Plaintiff:
JON SANDERSON CHRIS HAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00695
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Seay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Seay v. USA
as 4:2021cv00022
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darryl Marshall Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
