Cases 91 - 100 of 110
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Zondervan Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv01097
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc. and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Defendant:
Zondervan Corporation and Meredith Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Lantrip v. McSwain
as 4:2009cv01662
Petitioner:
Thomas Nelson Lantrip, III
Respondent:
Ellis McSwain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Schneider v. Michael Hardesty, et al
as 09-3892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. SCHNEIDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARDESTY, HATCHLANDS FINANCE, LTD., INNOVATIVE BUSINESS CONSULTING, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS NELSON
Thomas Nelson, Inc. et al v. SIMA International, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00631
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc., Thomas Nelson, Inc., Marcus Buckingham and others
Defendant:
SIMA International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Olsen
as 3:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson, Inc. and Thomas Nelson, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Olsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Fowler v. Thomas Nelson Publishing
as 2:2009cv10903
Plaintiff:
Bradley L Fowler
Defendant:
Thomas Nelson Publishing
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Nelson v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daryal Thomas Nelson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Marylin Philpot, Franklin Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HA v. US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2008cv02136
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NELSON HA
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DIXON v. THOMAS NELSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
as 1:2008cv01908
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. DIXON
Defendant:
THOMAS NELSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nelson v. Collins et al
as 1:2008cv00968
Plaintiff:
Leslie Thomas Nelson, III
Defendant:
Collins, Walker and Langley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.