Cases 91 - 100 of 349,719
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lightfeather v. Jensen
as 8:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Grant Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Semler v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01850
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Brian Ninneman and Marc Zika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennington-Thurman v. Jenkerson et al
as 4:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Wilma Pennington-Thurman
Defendant:
Dennis M. Jenkerson, Unknown Erb, Robert J. Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Troka v. McCown et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ethan Troka
Defendant:
Patrick McCown, North Central Unit Chaple, Jeffery Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ethan C Hill
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Insight Direct USA, Inc. v. WalMart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05109
Plaintiff:
Insight Direct USA, Inc.
Defendant:
WalMart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
