Cases 101 - 110 of 6,123
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Federal Protective Services et al
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Protective Services and San Francisco County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Valerie Carr
Defendant:
3M Company and Arziant Healthcare, Inc.
The Appeal, Inc. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
The Appeal, Inc.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Shawn Emmons, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and others
Pye v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
William James Pye
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CARR v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNA J. CARR
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
