Cases 101 - 110 of 469
Avery v. Wooten et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Gary Sneed, Lisa Cooke, David Dobbins and others
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Charles Smith v. Reed Richardson
as 20-1064
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES R. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
REED A. RICHARDSON
Smith v. SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03624
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith and Charles L. Smith
Defendant:
Cole Geff I, LLC, SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC and SWH Mimi's Cafe, LLC doing business as Mimi's Cafe 038
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Richarson
as 1:2019cv01701
Petitioner:
Charles R Smith
Respondent:
Reed Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20759
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES DARNELL SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Bergami
as 3:2019cv00285
Petitioner:
Charles Kelvin Smith
Respondent:
T Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles Smith, Jr. v. David Grant Medical Center, et al
as 19-16741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER
Smith v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 4:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16803
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eddie J. Suber et al v. Michael Calhoun et al
as 2:2019cv06593
Plaintiff:
Norma J. Suber, Eddie J. Suber, Charles H. Smith and others
Defendant:
Michael Calhoun and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
