Cases 101 - 110 of 123
Hammett et al v. Emerald Correctional Management Inc.
as 1:2009cv00984
Plaintiff:
Robert Hammett, Petronilo Franco, Darrel Smith and others
Defendant:
Emerald Correctional Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2009cv00767
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Allen et al v. Rhodia, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Larry Allen, Daniel Anders, Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Rhodia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04716
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Brown, Rhonda Brown, Rhonda Brown and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Sealy et al
as 5:2009ct03056
Plaintiff:
Robert Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Ken Sealy, Terry Harris, Jeffery Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. D. L. Stine et al
as 6:2008cv00268
Petitioner:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Respondent:
D.L. Stine, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL, United States Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SMITH v. D. L. STINE et al
as 1:2008cv01268
Petitioner:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Respondent:
D. L. STINE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smith v. USP - McCreary
as 6:2008cv00226
Petitioner:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Respondent:
USP- McCreary
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wochos v. Smith
as 6:2008cv06070
Plaintiff:
Wenzel Wochos
Defendant:
Darrell - Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
