Cases 101 - 110 of 182
Allen v. Warden Falk
as 15-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FALK, Sterling Correctional Facility
Allen v. Barbour et al
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Isaac Edward Allen
Defendant:
R. Kevin Barbour, Paul Oesterreicher, John Howard Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Dobbs
as 4:2015cv00268
Petitioner:
Isaac Edward Allen
Respondent:
Mark Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Raemisch, et al
as 14-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN, AKA Edward Clutts
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, UNKNOWN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DESIGNEE, ANTHONY DECESARO and others
Buck v. American Quarter Horse, et al
as 14-4063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ALLEN BUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN QUARTER HORSE ASSOCIATION, PETER J. COFRANCESCO, III, GENE GRAVES and others
Allen et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15854
Plaintiff:
Mattie Christine Allen and Virgil Edward Allen
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. DeCsoro et al
as 1:2014cv01173
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen
Defendant:
Anthony DeCsoro, Donaled Confield, Lovaren Heermonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014cv01176
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen
Defendant:
Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch, Maggie Lervaon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clack v. Torre
as 14-931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edward Allen Clack, III
Defendant:
Michael Torre, individual and official capacities and Jane Doe, Detective, In her official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark O'Connor, Guilford Police Department, Sandra Brooks, Detective and others
Allen v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00944
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
