Cases 101 - 110 of 257
Smith v. Williams et al
as 4:2016cv01545
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, Toni L Deer and Paula Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Smith-Williams v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv03556
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lynn Smith-Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Ashro, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
Debra Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Ashro, Inc., Citibank, N.A. , Sears Consumer Financial Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 0.303 Acres of Land in Sumter County Florida et al
as 5:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
0.303 Acres of Land in Sumter County Florida, McGregor Smith, Jr., Jacqueline C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02008
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Van Willis Smith
Defendant:
Bridget Lynn Smith, E Choate, T Cote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Patricia Dysart, et al
as 15-8020
Respondent:
Patricia Dysart, Kay Lorraine Johnston, Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, formerly known as Luzenac America, Inc.
Dysart et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv01221
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia J. Dysart , Kay Lorraine Johnston , Concetta Bonfiglio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 15-2213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charlita Martin Covington, Amanda Crouch, Marie Crudale and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
