Cases 101 - 110 of 1,258
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kelley v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Margaret Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp.
as 1:2023cv03725
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Port Authority Trans Hudson Corp.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph Baliga v. Michael Smith, et al
as 23-1786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH BALIGA
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SMITH, in their personal capacities only, HOLLY NEWELL, LEA ELLINGWOOD and others
Foskey v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2023cv03583
Plaintiff:
Edward Foskey
Defendant:
Officer Martin Zimmer, Chief Michael Smith, Freeport Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. IDEAL CONCEPTS, INC.
as 5:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
IDEAL CONCEPTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. Technicote, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 58, Carl Farrell, Saint Louis Painters Pension Trust and others
Defendant:
Technicote, Inc. and Ronald B. Teague
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10805
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
