Cases 101 - 110 of 5,398
(PC) Saintillus v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Chaloner Saintillus
Defendant:
United States of America, Phillip A. Talbert, Samuel E. Stefanki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Freya Pearson
as 24-10483
Petitioner:
In re: FREYA D. PEARSON
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DR. DONNA M. HIGH
Pearson et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Kathy Pearson and Joseph Pearson
Defendant:
Exactech Inc and Exactech US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joshua Dunlap v. Robin Fish, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DUNLAP
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER ROBIN FISH, CORPORAL LAKEIA WELLS, SERGEANT PEARSON and others
Barber v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Zeqoia Pearson v. Walmart Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02568
Plaintiff:
Zeqoia AujuLii Pearson
Defendant:
Walmart Associates, Inc., Walmart Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
United States of America v. Pearson
as 24-283
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRISTIN PEARSON
LEE v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Admiral Insurance Company v. Pearson et al
as 5:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aaron Wayne Pearson, Leandra Lynn Pearson, ONEOK Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
