Cases 101 - 110 of 168
US v. George, Jr.
as 15-1892
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN GEORGE, JR.
Interested Party:
SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Saunders v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
as 3:2015cv00201
Defendant:
Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Selena R. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rocha v. Southeastern Regional Transit Authority et al
as 1:2015cv11516
Plaintiff:
Roy Rocha
Defendant:
Southeastern Regional Transit Authority and South Coast Transit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ioppolo et al v Port of Seattle et al
as 2:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
Joseph A Ioppolo , David McCray , Sally McCray and others
Defendant:
Port of Seattle , Puget Sound Energy Inc , King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Richland County Penny Tax et al
as 3:2014cv04922
Plaintiff:
Mamie Jackson
Defendant:
Richland County Penny Tax, South Carolina Department of Revenue, Richland County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. Retirement Income Plan v. New Orleans Regional Transit Authority et al
as 2:2014cv02485
Plaintiff:
Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. Retirement Income Plan
Defendant:
Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc and New Orleans Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
