Cases 101 - 110 of 207
Marshall et al v. Cage Water Technology LLC
as 1:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
William Hunter Marshall , Scott King and Robert Daniel Young
Defendant:
Cage Water Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
USA v. Robert Walker
as 16-10066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIEL WALKER
Trulove v. San Francisco et al
as 3:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jamal Rashid Trulove
Defendant:
City & County San Francisco , Maureen D'Amico, Michael Androvich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pharmaplast S.A.E v. ZUES Medical Holdings et al
as 2:2015cv02432
Defendant:
Mark Bolling, Robert Daniels, Daniel Mulvany and others
Plaintiff:
Pharmaplast S.A.E
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Strudley et al v. Santa Cruz County Bank et al
as 5:2015cv05106
Plaintiff:
Raf Strudley , Ruth Strudley , Matthew Hansen and others
Defendant:
Santa Cruz County Bank , John Geringer, Christopher A. Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BROPHY et al
as 5:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LISA MARGARET RAY BROPHY, ROBERT DANIEL RAY, JR, LINDA KILLORAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Joplin, Jr. v. Actavis PLC et al
as 1:2015cv05777
Plaintiff:
Robert Daniel Joplin, Jr.
Defendant:
Actavis PLC, Actavis Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
Robert Daniels v. USA
as 15-11371
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DANIELS, a.k.a. Twin T
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
