Cases 101 - 110 of 606
Farnsworth v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Leo Brandon Farnsworth
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, Harold W. Clarke, Ralph Shearer Northam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEARER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46513
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SHEARER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Shearer's Foods LLC v. Symmetry Energy Solutions LLC
as 3:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Shearer's Foods LLC
Defendant:
Symmetry Energy Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Gulbronson v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv01296
Plaintiff:
Eric Conrad Gulbronson
Defendant:
Gena Jones, J. Peterson, Fergus Leckie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harold Milam v. Kevin Shearer, et al
as 21-5664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAROLD MICHAEL MILAM
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN S. SHEARER, SHERIFF DEREK POLSTON and RUSSELL COUNTY FISCAL COURT
SHEARER v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv12692
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA SHEARER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
