Cases 101 - 110 of 856
Oriska Corporation v. Brookhaven Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, LLC et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02031
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Defendant:
Brookhaven Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, LLC, Mr. Benjamin Landa, David Freid and others
Federal Express Corporation et al v. Unger Fabrik, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2021cv02163
Defendant:
Unger Fabrik, L.L.C., John Yamada, Ajay Aggarwal and others
Plaintiff:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Unger v. Saul
as 6:2021cv03048
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Unger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNGER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv02718
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ANNE UNGER and ROBERT OSHETSKY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. Ash et al
as 4:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Richard Unger, Unknown De Guzman, A Ash and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unger v. Furman University
as 6:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Elaine Unger
Defendant:
Furman University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Berroteran v. CIT Group Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Dorene C. Dominguez, FC Merger Subsidiary IX, Inc., William M. Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Berroteran
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
