Cases 111 - 120 of 4,156
Hess v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02579
Plaintiff:
Amber Hess
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyd et al v. City of San Rafael et al
as 3:2023cv04085
Plaintiff:
Shaleeta Boyd, Amalia Mendoza, Floyd Barrow and others
Defendant:
City of San Rafael, Christine Alilovich, David Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HESS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv21503
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Charleston v. Brabham Oil Company, Inc.
as 23-1802
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLESTON
Defendant / Appellant:
BRABHAM OIL COMPANY, INC., COLONIAL GROUP, INC., ENMARK STATIONS, INC. and others
Rivera v. City of San Rafael et al
as 4:2023cv03804
Plaintiff:
Mark Rivera
Defendant:
City of San Rafael, Sgt. Cleland, Chris Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
