Cases 111 - 116 of 116
GARCIA v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2008cv01725
Plaintiff:
JULIAN GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, MICHAEL DEFABIO, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 0:2008cv00754
Plaintiff:
Don Bailey, Joseph Crawnley, Jr., Edward Dickhausen and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bailey et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02161
Plaintiff:
Don Bailey, Joseph Crawnley, Jr., Edward Dickhausen and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Addicks v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Addicks, Jr
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Doug Dretke, R Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar et al v. Apartment Investments and Management Company et al
as 3:2007cv00034
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dunbar, John Bonanno, William Boozer, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Apartment Investments and Management Company, Aimco Properties, L.P. and NHP Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HASHIM, A-KINBO JIHAD-SURU v. BERGE, GERALD A.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2001cv00314
Plaintiff:
A'Kinbo J.S. Hashim, John D. Tiggs, Jr., Ezra C. Martin and others
Defendant:
Gerald A. Berge and Doyle, Jr., James E.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.