Cases 111 - 120 of 146
Tucker v. McKinney et al
as 5:2011cv01109
Plaintiff:
David Tucker
Defendant:
Wayne McKinney, Jeff Davis and Michael E Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erin K Baldwin v. The State Bar of California et al
as 5:2011cv01300
Defendant:
Matthew T Akin, Matthew T Akin, Christopher Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Erin K Baldwin
Carreon v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Ramon Carreon
Defendant:
Jeff Davis, Cindy Loftus and Pedro Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barker v. Banai et al
as 8:2011cv01642
Plaintiff:
Cecile Barker
Defendant:
Eyal Banai, Jeff Davis, Mistral Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Minnesota Majority, et al v. Joe Mansky, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Minnesota Majority, Minnesota Voters Alliance, Minnesota Northstar Tea Party Patriots and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Mansky, in his official capacity as the Elections Manager for Ramsey County, Rachel M. Smith, in her official capacity as the Elections Manager for Hennepin County, Mike Freeman, in his official capacity as Hennepin County Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Global Crossing Local Services, Inc. v. The Missouri Public Service Commission et al
as 4:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Global Crossing Local Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The Missouri Public Service Commission , Kevin Gunn , Robert M. Clayton, III and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Davis
as 3:2010cv05909
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davis
Defendant:
City of Pacific and J Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trout v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00928
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davis Trout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
