Cases 111 - 120 of 169
Earl Morgan, III v. R. Lewi
as 13-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL J. MORGAN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
R. K. LEWIS, HCC Captain, J. W. KING, HCC Sergeant, DOBYNS, Sergeant and others
Defendant:
PATRICK J. GURNEY, HCC Assist. Warden and DANIEL T. MAHON
BROWN v. CHURCHWELL, et al
as 5:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
JOE BROWN
Defendant:
CHURCHWELL, SAXTON, DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton et al v. TIN, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02367
Plaintiff:
Kathi S Carlton , James Carlton, Jr. , Otis O Magee and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv01720
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah K. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Saavedra v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2012cv03478
Plaintiff:
Jovanny Saavedra
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda County Sheriff Office, G Gosal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jonathan Lewis v. Wansley Walters, et al
as 12-13287
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN K. LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
WANSLEY WALTERS, Secretary, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01433
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lewis v. Chase Bank, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01189
Plaintiff:
Lori K. Lewis
Defendant:
April Batista, Chase Bank and Annamarie H. Bongiovanni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lewis et al v. Gardiner, et al
as 2:2012cv00986
Plaintiff:
David K. Lewis, Ken A Marchesin and Robert Mistriel
Defendant:
Gardiner, M. Brown, R. Weeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012cv04021
Plaintiff:
Peter L. Vasquez
Defendant:
Dax K. Lewis and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
