Cases 111 - 120 of 777
Fuqua #215717 v. Unknown Party
as 3:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Ray
as 22-10032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Ray
KING v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray King
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Michael Mitchell
as 21-3890
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Ray Mitchell
Michael Fortuna v. Mr. Hudgins
as 21-7677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FORTUNA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT HUDGINS, Warden, DOCTOR ANDERSON, Doctor at Medical Services, MS. WILSON, Physicians Assistant and others
Michael Fortuna v. Mrs. Hoffman
as 21-7489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FORTUNA
Defendant / Appellee:
MRS. HOFFMAN, Medical Administrator, MRS. KROGAN, Assistant Medical Administrator, MR. DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MRS. JANE DOE, Medical Administrator, MR. JOHN DOE, Warden at FCI Morgantown and others
Washington v. Haslem et al
as 8:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Washington
Defendant:
Senior Classification Officer Mrs. Haslem, Warden J. Cox, Colonial Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Conley et al
as 2:2021cv01218
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Deal
Defendant:
Officer Conley, K-9 Puma, Officer Walvert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRONRATH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54209
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY CRONRATH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Swanson v. USA
as 21-35779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY SWANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
