Cases 111 - 120 of 167
Sherno v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2014cv00982
Defendant:
Anoka County , City of Apple Valley , City of Arlington and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wallace Sherno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KLUGE v. FOUR WOOD COUNTY, OHIO DOMESTIC RELATION COURTS et al
as 1:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
KURT G. KLUGE
Defendant:
FOUR WOOD COUNTY, OHIO DOMESTIC RELATION COURTS and URSULA I. KLUGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Earle v. Jim Brown, et al
as 14-40056
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEAN EARLE
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM BROWN, Wood County Sheriff, JIM WHEELER, Wood County District Attorney, JOEY FENLAW, Wood County Assistant District Attorney and others
Sundowner Association v. Wood County Commission
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Sundowner Association and Kendall Richards
Defendant:
Wood County Commission , Wayne Dunn , Stephen Gainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Rodriguez, et al v. OH Bur. Crim. Investigation, et al
as 13-3975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff:
SCOTT RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
OHIO BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, WOOD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOHN DOES, (1-3) and others
Erikson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00858
Plaintiff:
Michael Ed Erikson
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Woods County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KLUGE v. WOOD COUNTY, OHIO
as 1:2013cv04642
Plaintiff:
KURT G. KLUGE
Defendant:
WOOD COUNTY, OHIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harry Lott v. HMP Of Wood County, PLLC
as 13-3841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY WILLIAM LOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
HMP OF WOOD COUNTY, PLLC
Getz v. Swoap et al
as 3:2013cv01492
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Getz
Defendant:
J. Swoap , Mark Wasylyshyn and Wood County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lott v. HMP of Wood County, PLLC
as 2:2013cv00463
Plaintiff:
Harry William Lott
Defendant:
HMP of Wood County, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
