Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 262
CHATHAM v. FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2015cv00024
Plaintiff: JOEY KEITH CHATHAM
Defendant: FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL, GARY SMITH and NATALIE KOON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHENEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00026
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GARY SMITH
Defendant: Murray Cheney, MARIE YAWN, William C. Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. Xing
as 1:2015cv01618
Defendant: Xing, Jiang Su Shi Cheng Yi You Xian Gong Si, MianSen Zheng and others
Plaintiff: Michael Kors, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SMITH v. CHENEY et al
as 5:2015cv00045
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GARY SMITH
Defendant: MURRAY CHENEY, MARIE YAWN, WILLIAM C DANFORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00968
Plaintiff: Gary Smith
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30826
Plaintiff: Teresa D. Smith and Gary Smith
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julianne Panagacos, et al v. John Towery, et al
as 14-35816
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIANNE PANAGACOS, ANDREA ROBBINS, JULIA GARFILED and others
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN J TOWERY, THOMAS R RUDD, CITY OF OLYMPIA and others
BAILEY et al v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00206
Plaintiff: DEMETRIUS BAILEY, JAYENECA BAILEY, DENISE BAILEY and others
Defendant: GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, DANIEL GEHLMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Gary Easterling We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4719
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GARY D. EASTERLING, a/k/a Gary Easterling, a/k/a Gary Smith, a/k/a Chew, a/k/a Black
Smith v. Danforth
as 1:2014cv02833
Petitioner: Michael Gary Smith
Defendant: William C. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?